Previously in this series: Linear programming and healthy diets — Part 1 Linear programing and the simplex algorithm Foods of the Father My dad’s an interesting guy. Every so often he picks up a health trend and/or weight loss goal that would make many people’s jaw drop.

Last week I was in Boston for the Geometry of Redistricting workshop. It was an optimistic gathering of over 500 mathematicians, computer scientists, lawyers, policy makers, teachers, and interested people of all stripes. There was a ton of information in the talks and subsequent discussions. I’ll try to distill the main ideas and avenues for research as best I can.

Problem: Express a boolean logic formula using polynomials. I.e., if an input variable $ x$ is set to $ 0$, that is interpreted as false, while $ x=1$ is interpreted as true. The output of the polynomial should be 0 or 1 according to whether the formula is true or false as a whole. Solution: You can do this using a single polynomial.

As a fun side project to distract me from my abysmal progress on my book, I decided to play around with the math genealogy graph! For those who don’t know, since 1996, mathematicians, starting with the labor of Harry Coonce et al, have been managing a database of all mathematicians. More specifically, they’ve been keeping track of who everyone’s thesis advisors and subsequent students were.

This post is a sequel to Formulating the Support Vector Machine Optimization Problem. The Karush-Kuhn-Tucker theorem Generic optimization problems are hard to solve efficiently. However, optimization problems whose objective and constraints have special structure often succumb to analytic simplifications.

The hypothesis and the setup This blog post has an interactive demo (mostly used toward the end of the post). The source for this demo is available in a Github repository. Last time we saw how the inner product of two vectors gives rise to a decision rule: if $ w$ is the normal to a line (or hyperplane) $ L$, the sign of the inner product $ \langle x, w \rangle$ tells you whether $ x$ is on the same side of $ L$ as $ w$.

The standard inner product of two vectors has some nice geometric properties. Given two vectors $ x, y \in \mathbb{R}^n$, where by $ x_i$ I mean the $ i$-th coordinate of $ x$, the standard inner product (which I will interchangeably call the dot product) is defined by the formula $$\displaystyle \langle x, y \rangle = x_1 y_1 + \dots + x_n y_n$$ This formula, simple as it is, produces a lot of interesting geometry.

Problem: Determine if two polynomial expressions represent the same function. Specifically, if $ p(x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n)$ and $ q(x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n)$ are a polynomial with inputs, outputs and coefficients in a field $ F$, where $ |F|$ is sufficiently large, then the problem is to determine if $ p(\mathbf{x}) = q(\mathbf{x})$ for every $ x \in F$, in time polynomial in the number of bits required to write down $ p$ and $ q$.

Problem: You have a catalog of items with discrete ratings (thumbs up/thumbs down, or 5-star ratings, etc.), and you want to display them in the “right” order.

papad Hard to believe Sanjeev Arora and his coauthors consider it “a basic tool [that should be] taught to all algorithms students together with divide-and-conquer, dynamic programming, and random sampling.” Christos Papadimitriou calls it “so hard to believe that it has been discovered five times and forgotten.” It has formed the basis of algorithms in machine learning, optimization, game theory, economics, biology, and more.